Daily Archives: January 22, 2011

Sheikh Abdul Kadir Mbogo Interview with the Torch Newspaper

Standard

sheikh Mbogo

Sheikh Abdul-Qadr Mbogo

Over time, Muslim leadership has been a centre of controversy for all the wrong reasons in Ugandan media. The Torch now embarks on striping the facts bare, bringing you personalities that have seen it all.

Sheikh Abdul Kadir Mbogo, the acting Kadhi of Kampala District Muslim Supreme has served the Muslim community since the days of Prince Nuhu Mbogo. Hamza Kyeyune, caught up with Sheikh Abdul-Qadr Mbogo at his home

Hamza: Give me an insight into the real life of Sheikh Mbogo.
Sheikh Mbogo: I was born on March 13th-1930, to the late Muslim Kyeswa in Ntinda. I spent my early years with my paternal aunt in Naguru, where I used to walk from, everyday to Wandegeya to attend Qur’an classes. Hajj Musa Kasule had constructed a small mosque in Wandegeya and he paid Shillings 12 as tuition for all Muslim students interested in studying the Qur’an.

It was very difficult then getting all that 12shs, Hajj Kasule was a very generous man and many young Muslims like sheikh Umar Dumba and many others benefited from his support. In 1945, I got sponsorship from Arabs to go to Yemen for further studies.

Hamza: when did you start serving Islam?
Sheikh Mbogo: when I returned from Yemen in 1951, I was appointed by Sheikh Ssekimwanyi as the Imam of Abdul-Aziiz Bulwadda.

Hamza: who is Abdul-Aziz Bulwadda?
Sheikh Mbogo: When King Mwanga ordered the burning of what is now referred to as Uganda Martyrs, all people who refused to renounce foreign religions including Muslims were burnt. Abdul-Aziiz Bulwadda was among those to be burnt. Allah is greater! As he was about to be burnt one of his friends from the palace came and fooled Mukajanga
(the executioner) that Abdul Aziiz was urgently needed by the Kabaka because he had committed some other crimes in the palace. That is how he survived with about three other Muslims.

Hamza: were there Muslim wrangles during that time?
Sheikh Mbogo: Yes, only that the magnitude wasn’t so severe. Dis-unity in Uganda dates as far back in 1921 after the death of Prince Nuhu Mbogo. During the reign of Mbogo, all Muslims in Uganda, Tanzania performed Juma and Zhuhur (Juma ne Zukuuli). In 1920, Sheikh Ssekimwanyi performed pilgrimage to Mecca and learnt that after
performing Juma, one does not perform Zhuhur. So, in 1921 after the death of Mbogo, Ssekimwanyi started popularizing the idea that Juma is performed alone, but Mbogo’s followers rejected his claim saying he was looking for ways of becoming the leader of Muslims. Only few people like Salim Makeera of Bwala, Abdallah Kuwala of Butambala and a few others accepted Ssekimwanyi’s doctrine.

That marked the beginning of disunity in Islam here in Uganda, with Ssekimwanyi leading the pro-Juma sect, and Sheikh Swaib Ssemakula leading the pro Juma ne Zukuuli sect. Ayub Nsibirwa who was Kabaka Daudi’s artisan who had secured the whole of Bukoto land from Daudi Chwa gave Ssekimwanyi all the land he needed to construct a Mosque for
Juma sect to avoid clashing with Kibuli. Throughout that time, all the Muslims that went to Mecca went for two reasons; One to perform hajj and secondly, to see for them selves if it was true that in Mecca they only pray Juma as claimed by Ssekimwanyi. Those that came back from hajj joined Ssekimwanyi because; in Mecca they only performed Juma.

Part 2

This is the second part of our interview with Sheikh Abdul Qadir Mbogo, the acting Kadhi of Kampala Muslim District Supreme Council on Muslim Wrangles that were sparked off by doctrinal differences.  Sheikh Mbogo was there and saw it all, he relives the experince.

HAMZA: Were there any attempts to reconcile the Juma and Zhuri sect under Sheikh Swaib Ssemakula and the Juma sect led by Sheikh Ssekimwanyi?

SHEIKH MBOGO: The efforts were not successful. A new movement called National Association For the Advancement of Muslims [NAAM] started with a motto “abasiraamu tubeere bumu” Muslims lets unite.

During this time, a sizeable number of young Muslims had graduated from Azhar  in Egypt like Sheikh Abdu Obeid Kamulegeya and others from other Arab countries. So as young educated Muslims, we decided to form NAAM purposely to unite Muslims in Uganda. Hajj Shaban Nkuutu who was the minister for Works and also UPC chairman for Busoga region then, gave NAAM the momentum it required to prosper. The then Minister of Information who was also Obote’s brother Hajj Akbar Adoko Nechon became the leader of NAAM with Kamulegeya as his deputy. Obote’s regime had 6 muslim ministers including Hajj Kirunda Kiveijinja, Hajj Moses Ali and others, that also supported NAAM.  

Hamza: Were there other factions during this time?

Mbogo: Like I told you previously, the Muslim Community [Kibuli Faction] under Prince Badru Kakungulu enjoyed an enormous following country wide. This constantly placed NAAM and Muslim Community at loggerheads. This tense situation in some parts of the country ended in violence sometimes causing deaths

Hamza: This brings me to a tale I have always heard about the Kajara bloodshed. Have you heard about it?

Mbogo: Hmmmm young man, heard about it?  Was there when it happened, it is a sad incident! Kajara`was a controversial area with a sizeable number of Muslims paying allegiance to Muslim Community under prince Badru Kakungulu, while another group supported NAAM. So, the pro NAAM Muslims invited us to go and celebrate mauled (birth of the Prophet Muhammad] with them. The group also asked the Mufti enthrone their Imam from NAAM as the official Imam of the area.

 But on our way to Kajara, we were informed that a rival group opposed to NAAM was ready to confront whoever would dare impose on them an Imam. Organizers of the event decided to host the Mauled a few meters from the Mosque.

We were told that all the people dressed in new Kanzus [Islamic tunic] belonged to the faction that was prepared for a show down should an imam from the NAAM group be imposed on them. When we arrived we saw a number of people guarding the mosque. We were told that each person we see at the mosque has two  tins of stones with strict instructions not to give way to NAAM invaders, “if it means dying, use your stones and when they are finished, you must be killed from the very spot where we have placed you, agreed? And all those guarding the mosque agreed not to surrender or unless they are killed. I later learnt that the commander of this group was the father of Imam Iddi Kasozi, the chairman of Uganda Muslim Youths Assembly.

Hamza: Is he still alive?

Mbogo: No, he was the first to be killed in the fracas.

Hamza: NAAM officials as leaders didn’t care that the situation was likely to turn violent? Who owned the mosque by the way? Was it constructed by NAAM?

Mbogo: The mosque was not constructed by NAAM, it was a community mosque co-owned by both NAAM supporters and Muslim Community supporters. In fact, some of us suggested to the Mufti Sheik Ssemakula that instead of fighting with fellow Muslims, we should postpone inducting the NAAM Imam after mauled ceremonies, but others objected to that idea and insisted we should induct our Imam.

Hamza: So, what happened there after?

Mbogo: So, after the mawuledi, the Mufti Sheikh Semakula selected people to go and represent him to install the NAAM Imam. At this point, the battle lines had been officially drawn. Sheikh Obeid Kamulegeya led the attacking brigade and the father of Imam Iddi Kasozi led the defending brigade of the mosque.

Hamza: So, the defending brigade had heaps of stones with them, how were the NAAM officials going to defend them selves?

Mbogo: Hamza, I told you earlier the leader of NAAM was Obote’s brother and a minister. Besides that, NAAM had six high profile ministers in government. So we had very well armed security personnel. So, when the stones brigade saw NAAM officials advancing towards the mosque, their commander threw a big stone that hit one escort forcing him to drop his gun. When the escort picked up his gun, he started shooting at those guarding the mosque indiscriminately.  So the war had now officially started, stones rained from left, right and centre, while gun shots were sounding all over.  It was now time to save our lives, the Mufti Sheikh Swaib Ssemakula, Kamulegeya and I drove off in the middle of the war at a breakneck speed and our first destination was Mbarara. I don’t know how others like Sheikh Kaduyu, Sheikh Hatwib Mukulu Wakika and Abasi Balinda escaped death.

Hamza: Where did you go in Mbarara?

Mbogo: In Mbarara, we went to Hajj Tegawa’s home and waited for news from Kajara. We first got the news from Hajj Abasi Kazibwe. He informed us that a number of Muslims had died, in Kajara during the clash. Other sources reported seeing four dead bodies while others said six. Because there were no mobile phones then we would not establish the exact figures immediately.  

Hamza: How did this absurd situation end?

Mbogo: We travelled back to Kampala but there was a lot of tension between NAAM and Muslim Community.  It ended with the arrest of Prince Badru Kakungulu.

Hamza: How was that possible? Did he attend Kajara ceremonies?

Mbogo: No, but  after the deaths in Kajara, NAAM officials advised Obote that its Prince Badru Kakungulu restraining Muslims from supporting his government and advised him to deal with Kakungulu by all means. So one afternoon, while Kakungulu was attending a ceremony in Kawempe, he was picked up together with six other people including Abu Mayanja, Sheikh Ali Kulumba and Hajj Nasibu by state operatives. This worsened the relationship between Obote and Baganda because he had already exiled King Muteesa.

Part 3 

 

Immediately after overthrowing Obote, late Idd Amin started efforts to unite the sharply divided Muslim community. Sheikh Abdul Qadir, Mbogo, the Kadhi of Kampala attended the Kabale unification conference. Sheikh Mbogo spoke to our reporter Hamza Kyeyune was took place in Kabale.
HAMZA: Which Muslim leaders took part in the Kabale unification congress that was initiated by Iddi Amin?

Sheikh Mbogo: All leaders of Muslim factions in Uganda however small they were attended. Uganda Muslim Community led by Prince Badru Kakungulu, African Muslim Community-Bukoto-Nateete led by Sheikh Zaidi Mugenyi’Asooka, NAAM under Sheikh Obeid Kamulegeya, Shia and Agakhan sects amongst others were all represented.

HAMZA: Kabale was a very remote place compared to Kampala, what led Amin to choose such a place?

Sheikh Mbogo: He said he chose Kabale because it was safe from rumormongers in Kampala. He told us that Muslim unity was his priority as a president and swore not to let us return back to our homes until we forge a way forward. He asked us to adopt a name embracing all Muslim factions in Uganda and also suggest a title for the leader of Muslims in Uganda.

HAMZA: Did Amin chair the conference himself?
Sheikh Mbogo: No, he only gave opening remarks and appointed Nkambo Mugerwa, a celebrated non Muslim Kampala lawyer to chair the conference. He reasoned that Mugerwa was not a Muslim he was not an interested party and would therefore play a neutral role.

So many names were proposed for the association but well agreed with the suggestion of Hassan Ssebuuza, to call our organization Uganda Muslim Supreme Council[UMSC]. We also adopted
the title of Mufti for the head of the newly founded UMSC. Previously the Muslim head was known as chief Kadhi. Immediately, we held elections for the Mufti.
HAMZA: Was the contest as stiff as it is today, and who were the main contenders in the conference.

Sheikh Mbogo:  It was a hot election. The competition was between the National Association for the Advancement of Muslims [NAAM] who fielded Sheikh Abdrazaak Matovu, while Uganda Muslim Congress brought Sheikh Ali Kulumba.

At the close of the poll, Sheikh Abdurazaak Matovu was elected Mufti, and Kulumba was appointed his deputy.

Hajj Badru Kakungulu was elected the first Chairman of UMSC, while Hajj Ali Balunywa became his deputy. Officials of districts were elected later after returning to their respective districts.

HAMZA: Did the Kabale conference resolve the problem of Muslim leadership wrangles in Uganda?

Sheikh Mbogo: Temporarily because, after the formation of UMSC, Amin promised to bring the custodian of the two holy mosques of Mecca and Madina, king Faisal Ibn Abdul-Aziiz then.  While in Uganda, King Faisal increased scholarships for Muslims, promised salaries for Medina graduates, and on his way back, he performed Swalat Juma at old Kampala.

It was still bushy as it had just been allocated to Muslims by Amin. The prayer was led by Sheikh Kulumba and it started at Midday. After the prayer, King Faisal promised to contact Kuwait and Jordan to construct a grand mosque as headquarters for Ugandan Muslims. 

Amin ordered the opening up of a UMSC mosque construction account in Jeddah with Aziiz Kasujja (then working with Libyan Bank) and Moses Ali, the then Finance Minister as signatories.

Kasujja and Kamulegeya contracted Concorp, to construct the grand mosque. A lot of money was solicited on mawuledi country wide for the construction of the mosque, but the construction stalled after sometime.

Amin summoned Aziizi Kasujja, Obeid Kamulegeya and others to explain why the construction
had stalled, when they failed to explain, he arrested them and jailed them. The mufti also resigned later.

Hamza; Why did Abdurazaak resign?

Sheikh Mbogo: At that time, everyone who went to Mecca was given travelers cheque. Unfortunately on several occasions, people who had cleared their fare for Hajj would find their names deleted and replaced by more influential people.

People complained and the matters reached the president. Amin asked for an explanation from
the Mufti in vain. As a result he forced the Mufti to resign. Amin appointed Amis Safi and Col. Emilio Mondo to manage the finance affairs of the UMSC. This was in the evening before he was toppled by UNLF.
HAMZA: So, how did UMSC consolidate its power after Amin?

Sheikh Mbogo
: Paul Muwanga a personal friend of Prince Badru Kakungulu and also the Min. of Internal Affairs in the UNLF government asked Kakungulu to suggest a name of a Muslim head.

He proposed Qassim Mulumba, who was appointed interim Mufti for a period of six months. It was expected that after that time Muslims would be in position to elect a new leadership.

However, Mulumba exceeded the mandate given to him and as a result a parallel leadership under Sheikh Obeid Kamulegeya was installed.

HAMZA: For how long did this situation continue?

Sheikh Mbogo: Not long, Prince Badru Kakungulu succeeded in mediating
between the two parallel factions and they agreed to work together.

HAMZA: How did they resolve it?

Sheikh Mbogo: Kamulegeya agreed to give up his claim to Mufti-ship and became a deputy to Mulumba. But because of intense pressure from Kamulegeya and his clique, Mulumba was forced to resign, and Kamulegeya fully occupied the seat of Muftiship at Agakhan mosque, Old Kampala.

HAMZA: When Mulumba resigned, did he approve of Kamulegeya Muftiship?

Sheikh Mbogo: No, Mulumba formed a parallel faction and established his base along Rubaga road where he continued to challenge the leadership of Kamulegeya as the mufti at Old Kampala.

Source: The Torch Newspaper

www.thetorchnewsug.com

5 Reasons, As To Why God Uses Problems

Standard

 
The problems that you face, will either defeat you or develop you, depending on how, you respond to them.  Unfortunately, most people fail to see, as to how God wants to use problems, for good causes, in their respective lives.  They react foolishly, and resent their problems, rather than pausing to consider, as to what benefits, they might bring.
 
 Here are five ways, that God wants to use the problems, in your life:-
1.God Uses Problems, To DIRECT You
 
Sometimes, God must light a fire under you, to get you moving.  Problems often point us, in new directions, and motivate us, to change.  Is God trying, to get your attention?  Sometimes it takes
a painful situation, to make us change, our ways. 
2. God Uses Problems, To INSPECT You
 
People, are like tea bags.  If you want to know, as to what is inside them, just drop them, into hot water!  Has God tested your faith, with a problem?  What do problems reveal, about you?  When you have many kinds of troubles, you should be full of joy; because you know that these troubles test your faith; and this will give you, patience.”
3. God Uses Problems, To CORRECT You
 
Some lessons we learn only through pain and failure.
It’s likely that as a child your parents told you not to touch a hot stove.
 But you probably learned by being burned. Sometimes we only learn
the value of something… health, money, a relationship. ..
by losing it. “It was the best thing that could have happened to me,
for it taught me to pay attention to your laws.” 
4. God Uses Problems To PROTECT U
A problem can be, a blessing in disguise, if it prevents you from
being harmed, by something more serious.  Last year, a friend of mine 
was fired from his job, only for having refused to do, something unethical, that his boss
had asked him, to do.  That friend’s unemployment, was a problem, but that
itself saved him, from being convicted and sent to prison, a year
later; when the actions of the Management of his previous office, were eventually discovered.
“You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good…
5. God Uses Problems, To PERFECT You
Problems, when responded to correctly, are character builders.
God, is far more interested in your character, than in your comfort. 
Your relationship with God, and your character, are the only two
things that you are going to take with you, into eternity.
 
 “We can rejoice, when we run into problems.  They helps us learn, to be patient.  Patience, develops strength of
character, in us; and helps us trust God more, each time that we use it, until finally our hope and faith, are strong and steady.” 
God is at work in your life, even when you do not recognize it, or understand it.  But it is much easier and more profitable, when you cooperate, with Him.
 
“Success can be measured, not only in achievements, but in lessons learned, lives touched, and moments shared, along the way”

fatima omar

timamuhaji@yahoo.com

ISLAMIC CONTRIBUTION TO HUMAN CIVILIZATION

Standard

In the name of Allah, the Most Beneficent, The Most Merciful

           Assalamo Alykum Wa Rehmatullahe wa Barakaatuh
“Let there arise out of you a group of peopleinviting to all that is good (Islam), Enjoining Al-Ma‘roof (i.e. Islamic Monotheism and all that Islam orders one to do) and Forbidding Al-Munkar (polytheism and disbelief and all that Islam has forbidden).And it is they who are the successful” [Aal ‘Imraan 3:1
—————————————————————————————-
ISLAM’S CONTRIBUTION TO HUMAN CIVILIZATION:
       SCIENCE AND CULTURE
We all know every religion has a civilization. Every civilization has its ups and downs. A civilization’s best “up” is what scholars often call its golden age. Indeed, every civilization has its golden age.
But it may have several golden ages; a golden age in certain domains of human life in one period of its history, another golden age in other domains, but in a different period. In the case of Islam, its golden age in science, technology and intellectual culture spanned about five centuries, from the ninth until the fourteenth centuries.
This is also the period of Islam’s dominance in world science and technology. During this period, Muslims made many important scientific discoveries and technological innovations, contributions to scientific culture, and advancements in intellectual culture in general. These Muslim achievements greatly influenced the European Renaissance in the 15th and 16th centuries, and the birth of modern science in the 17th century.
To speak about Islam’s gifts to humanity in just half an hour, even confined to science and technology alone, is to do a great injustice to the subject. However, given the fact that the subject is not that well known to many people today, especially in the West, even a glimpse of Islam’s major scientific contributions is welcome.

Moreover, given our current global situation when the worldwide focus is on Islam and the West, the subject of my talk tonight may remind us of things that can contribute to a better appreciation of the civilizational significance of Islam to the West in the past and to a healthier climate for a dialogue of civilizations in our contemporary world.
Bertrand Russell, the famous British philosopher, has rightly claimed, “it was the Arabs who introduced the empirical method” in the study of nature and cultivated it widely when they were leaders of the civilized world. The Greeks, adds Russell, might have been brilliant philosophers, but they were not interested in empirical investigations. In jest, Russell points to Aristotle, who claimed that men have more teeth than women. But that claim was never verified empirically. With two wives, he could have easily counted their teeth and counterchecked with his own. But he was not empirically minded. The scientific method, as it has been developed primarily at the hands of the West, was indeed invented by Muslims and first practiced by them on a large scale.
Muslim scientists then were not only Arabs, but also people of other racial and ethnic groups such as Persians, Indians and even Chinese. Many famous Muslim scientists who were also known and influential in the Latin West, had come from regions in Central and South Asia neighboring Afghanistan, where the focus of the West and indeed the
whole world is now centered. The tenth-century Ibn Sina, or Avicenna as he was known in the West, hailed from Uzbekistan which for centuries was noted for its world-leading centers of intellectual and scientific activity, such as Bukhara and Samarkand.
Ibn Sina’s contemporary, al-Biruni, regarded by many Western authorities as the greatest Muslim scientist of all time, was also born in today’s Uzbekistan. But he spent most of his life in the Indian subcontinent. He knew Afghanistan well. One of his most significant empirical studies was a geological survey of the Ganges Basin in India. This geological study  was to reward him with a theory of the continental shift, centuries before Western scientists became interested in the idea.

We can go on and on mentioning the names of past  Muslim scientists who were not Arabs. But the West has called them “Arabs” apparently because they had written in Arabic which was, by the way, the international scientific language of the day. Even today, many people in the West identify Islam with the Arabs and the Middle East. True, Islam originated with the Arabs, but gradually it became a global religion and
a global religious community embracing diverse ethnic and cultural groups from as far west as Spain and as far east as Indonesia and China.
Of course the majority of scientists in the western lands of Islam were Arabs, and they were better known in the West. The important point to take note is this. Muslim scientists in both the east and the west had cultivated a novel way of studying the physical and the natural world, namely the scientific method. This method of theirs was modern. It embraced the ideas of quantitative and empirical methods, mathematical methods, and rational and logical modes of enquiry as these are understood today. Thanks to their discovery and cultivation of this method, Muslim scientists were able to make great progress.
Many of their works became well known and influential in the West through their Latin translations. Many ideas advanced in these works were to have a lasting influence on western thought and culture, although in the course of time their Islamic origin became forgotten. When decades ago the Italian Orientalist, Assendro Baussani, tried to hammer home the point that “Islam is an integral part of western intellectual culture,” he was one of the few western voices aware of the historical role of Islam in western civilization.
Very few people in the West today know that Ibn Sina’s best medical work, Canon of Medicine, was taught for centuries in Western universities and was one of the most frequently printed scientific texts in the Renaissance. Likewise, few realize that when the West in the Age of Scholasticism and in the Renaissance wanted to rediscover Plato and Aristotle and the Greek roots of civilization, it could not do so by going back directly to the original Greek sources. It had to depend not only on Muslim translations of the Greek works, but also on Muslim interpreters.
For example, when the famous thirteenth-century theologian, St. Thomas Aquinas wanted to create a new rational theology, he encountered an Arabic Aristotle that had been Islamized. Aquinas saw that Aristotle had found a new home in Islam, so he wanted to seek one in Christianity. Aristotle had come to be accepted as a common heritage of Islam and the West. He is the father of western science, but he is also a founder of Islamic science.
Given the fact that today there are people inclined to believe in an imminent clash of civilizations and the incompatibility between Islam and the West, it is worth reminding ourselves that the two civilizations do share something precious in common, at least in their intellectual heritage. The West takes great pride in modern science as one of the greatest achievements of its intellect. This western achievement is something no one can deny or belittle. But it won’t be wrong for someone to make the following claim: there would not have been modern science without the Renaissance — and without Islamic science and philosophy, there would have been no Renaissance!

The success of the future rests on the success of the present, and the success of the present on the success of the past. Take for example one of the twentieth-century’s greatest scientific and technological feats; the epic journey to the moon and back to earth! That success is of course a triumph of American space science. But scientists of other nations and of earlier times have contributed in one form or another to its development. They have helped to lay the foundation of modern space science.

Again, it is little known that the immediate predecessor of modern space science is medieval Islamic astronomy. From the twelfth century, Muslim astronomers began to criticize the Ptolemaic planetary system. That was a great step forward in the history of astronomy. Islam was noted for its astronomical observatories, which have also developed into modern research canters of planetary science. Indeed, they must be regarded as scientific research institutions in the modern sense, for group research
was emphasized, and theoretical investigations went hand in hand with observations.
The most developed and perhaps the most successful of institutions of this type, scientifically speaking, was the observatory at Maragha in Azerbaijan. Many things can be said about the observatory in support of the contention that Islamic scientific culture had reached a well-developed stage. The observatory had as its director a leading scientist of the day, by the name of Nasir al-Din al-Tusi. It engaged in both teaching and research. Although the main line of research there was planetary science, an interdisciplinary approach was emphasized. The scientists working there were of different religious backgrounds and ethnicity, including Chinese. It was the Cape Kennedy of its day. Research findings were published and among the fruits of the Maragha research was a new planetary theory proposed by al-Tusi.
The last achievement of Islamic planetary astronomy in medieval times was a lunar model developed by Ibn al-Shatir from Damascus, based on al-Tusi’s theory. Some modern scholars have claimed that Copernicus was acquainted with this development in Islamic space science. In the words of one scholar, “all that is astronomically new in Copernicus can be found essentially in the school of al-Tusi and his students.” If that is so, then Copernicus may be regarded as the link between Islamic planetary science and its modern Western successor. If we are looking for scientists of the past who have contributed to the development of human thought on planetary science, without which man’s journey to the moon would have unthinkable, then the names of the Maragha scientists stand to be counted.
In this connection, I would like to stress on the important contribution Islam has made in the institutionalization of science. With state support and patronage by royalty and political rulers, science education and research become institutionalized. Consequently, scientific culture became more entrenched in society. No one can dispute the assertion that institutionalization constitutes a major phase in the development and progress of science. In initiating this particular phase of scientific progress, Islam has made another lasting contribution to world civilization. Research-based astronomical observatories and teaching hospitals were Islam’s best-known creations of scientific institutions, paving the way for a more intensified institutionalization of science at
the hands of the modern West. The organization and practices of Muslim hospitals greatly influenced the development of their Western counterparts. Clinical practice initiated by Muhammad Zakaria al-Raziearly in the tenth century became an integral component of Islamic medical practice for centuries before it was widely adopted in the West.

There is another important institution that owes its origin to Islam. This is the university as we know it today. Islam founded the oldest university in the world, the al-Azhar University in Cairo. The first Western universities were modeled after Muslim universities. Many features of Muslim universities came to be adopted by the West, whether these pertain to the organization of curricula or granting of degrees. Even the tradition of specialized chairs (professorships) owes its origin to Islam.  The famous eleventh/twelfth century al-Ghazzali was the first occupant of the Chair of Shafi’ite Law at the leading Nizamiyyah University in Baghdad, which at that time was the archrival of al-Azhar. The influence of Islam on the West in the domain of educational culture was indeed immense. However, again here as in many other domains, this is hardly known to contemporary westerners.
You may have noticed that in my lecture I did not dwell on scientific discoveries made by Muslims in the various branches of science such as mathematics, biology, geography, chemistry, physics and medicine. Muslim discoveries were indeed many and were of importance to the rise of modern science. Rather, I have chosen to deal with the practice of science itself, particularly with those aspects of it that Islam had introduced. Scientific methods, institutions, and the like are things that are part and parcel of contemporary scientific culture and that we all can see. Similarly, we can appreciate better Islam’s lasting contribution to world culture by talking about its historical role in the foundation of the university. In conclusion, it is my hope that this
glimpse of Islam’s contribution to science and culture will lead to a sincere desire on the part of many people to know more about the past civilizational relationship between Islam and the West. This is with the view of advancing the cause of dialogue of cultures. Thank you and God bless you.
——————————————————————————————————-
(Writer, Prof. Osman Bakar holds the Malaysia Chair of Islam in Southeast Asia, Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, Edmund Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. This is the text of Prof. Baker’s speech at the CIC’s annual Ottawa dinner, October 15, 2001.)
 _.___  Compiled, edited and adapted by Khalid Latif, e-tabligue>

One in four people in the world are Muslim

Standard

There are 1.57billion Muslims around the world, meaning that nearly one in four people practises Islam, according to a report published yesterday.
The size of the Muslim population has long been the subject of guesswork, with estimates ranging anywhere from one billion to 1.8billion.
But the report, by the Pew Research Centre’s Forum on Religion and Public Life, is billed as the most comprehensive of its kind.
Enlarge
The project, which has taken three years, presents a portrait of the Muslim world that might surprise some. For example, Germany has more Muslims than Lebanon, China has more than Syria, and Russia has more than Jordan and Libya combined.
One commentator, Amaney Jamal, an assistant professor of politics at Princeton University in the U.S., said: ‘This idea that Muslims are Arabs and Arabs are Muslims is obliterated by this report.’
Britain has 1,647,000 Muslims – 2.7 per cent of the UK population, and 0.1 per cent of the global Muslim population, the report said.
Islam is the world’s second largest religion behind Christianity, which has an estimated 2.1billion to 2.2billion followers.

More…
Zurich gives go-ahead to poster with ‘racist image of Islam’ ahead of Swiss vote on allowing minarets at mosques
The Pew centre, an American think-tank, calls the report the most thorough on the size and distribution of Muslims.
The task of determining the Muslim populations in 232 countries and territories involved analysing census reports, demographic studies and general population surveys.
The report provides further evidence that while the heart of Islam might beat in the Middle East, its greatest numbers lie in Asia – more than 60 per cent of the world’s Muslims live in Asia. Indonesia has the world’s largest Muslim population – 203million, or 13 per cent of the world’s total.

Global religion: The report showed that nearly one in four people in the world are Muslim
About 20 per cent of Muslims live in the Middle East and North Africa, 15 per cent in Sub-Saharan Africa, 2.4 per cent in Europe and 0.3 per cent in the Americas. Europe is home to about 38million.
The report made no reference to whether the Muslim population is on the increase. A Pew centre project next year will estimate growth rates among Muslim populations and project future trends.
The report also revealed that:
Europe is home to about 38 million Muslims, or about five per cent of its population. Germany appears to have more than 4 million Muslims – almost as many as North and South America combined. In France, where tensions have run high over an influx of Muslim immigrant laborers, the overall numbers were lower but a larger percentage of the population is Muslim.
Two-thirds of all Muslims live in 10 countries. Six are in Asia (Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Iran and Turkey), three are in North Africa (Egypt, Algeria and Morocco) and one is in sub-Saharan Africa (Nigeria).
Indonesia, which has a tradition of a more tolerant Islam, has the world’s largest Muslim population (203 million, or 13 per cent of the world’s total). Religious extremists have been involved in several high-profile bombings there in recent years.
In China, the highest concentrations of Muslims were in western provinces. The country experienced its worst outbreak of ethnic violence in decades when rioting broke out this summer between minority Muslim Uighurs and majority Han Chinese.
Of roughly 4.6 million Muslims in the Americas, more than half live in the United States although they only make up 0.8 percent of the population there. About 700,000 people in Canada are Muslim, or about two percent of the total population.

Ahmed Wetaka
P.O BOX 2488
Mbale- Uganda
Mobile +256 772 609736

Daawa caravan: 4 Days of reviving Islamic spirit

Standard

ASSALAMU ALAIKUM 

The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “Take benefit of five before five: Your youth before your old age, your health before your sickness, your wealth before your poverty, your free time before your preoccupation, and your life before your death.”
[Al-Hakeem, Al-Bayhaqee].Here the chance has come to revise revive your imaan. Let us visit North for Allah’s sake.

Donations are still needed, So far we have 2 bicycle donated by the Touch newspaper, we thank our brothers for that spirit being the first on the list of donors.

So Everybody with anything to donate please go ahead you can contact: the Daawa Minister        Nsobya Abdulhakim on 0702267228 or imam on 0702131272 or bring your donation at The Islamic University in Uganda Kampala Campus Located Kibuli and drop it to the reception.

U can donate;

-Books of Islamic literature

-Kanzus of imams in village mosques

-Bicycles for imams who wolk lond distances to conduct juma prayers

-Among others 

Mukisa Farahani

Publicity secretary Daawa secretariat.

0784460209

A GLOBAL APPEAL TO MUSLIMS

Standard

Asalam alaykum w.w
facebook
Facebook, for those have not heard about it, is a social networking website that was originally designed for college students, but is now open to anyone 13 years of age or older. Facebook users can create and customize their own profiles with photos, videos, and information about themselves. Friends can browse the profiles of other friends and write messages on their pages. Facebook has taken the world by storm, sorry by mega-storm, and as such it has attained the status of being the world’s largest social network.
The founder of this site is 25 year-old Mark Zuckerberg. Raised Jewish but now a self-proclaimed atheist, he is the world’s youngest billionaire.
Here are some statistics about Facebook. Far-fetched they may appear but be assured they are all facts extracted from the official Facebook site:
Ø More than 500 million active users
Ø 50% of active users (250,000 million) log on to Facebook on any given day
Ø Average user has 130 friends
Ø People spend over 700 billion minutes per month on Facebook
Ø There are over 900 million objects that people interact with (pages, groups, events and community pages)
Ø More than 30 billion pieces of content (web links, news stories, blog posts, notes, photo albums, etc.) shared each month.
Ø About 70% of Facebook users are outside the United States
Ø There are more than 200 million active users currently accessing Facebook through their mobile devices.
Ø People who use Facebook on their mobile devices are twice as active on Facebook as non-mobile users.
Recently Facebook apologized to Laura Eckert for disabling the account of this Iowa birth photographer who posted pictures the company initially deemed inappropriate, including shots of a friend and her newborn moments after birth. Facebook spokesman Simon Axten said the company reviews thousands of pieces of content every day and takes action to ensure Facebook “remains a safe and trusted environment for everyone.”
Her supporters had formed a group on Facebook to lobby for her reinstatement, saying the company was hypocritical for targeting photos they considered beautiful art while routinely allowing pictures of teenage girls dressed provocatively and others they consider obscene.
Muslim Youth and Facebook
The Facebook craze has caught up with our Muslim youth too. If we do not caution them now about its threats then we may regret in future. It has taken considerable control of not only of the male members of our society but the female ones too. Let us all join hands in a campaign to eradicate this vice which is steadily destroying the very fabric of the core Islamic morals and values.
From a broad, worldly perspective we could have nothing against this site. However, from Islamic viewpoint Facebook has serious problems.
The name ‘Facebook’ may sound harmless, but in real fact it is very deceptive. For the dangers it poses for the men (and women) of Iman, it should actually be called by any one of these names: Fasaadbook, Fitnabook, or Fisaaqbook. It is an enormous trap in which Muslims are incessantly getting ensnared en masse.
A person accessing Facebook can never save himself from committing one sin or the other. There are numerous pitfalls in this site that are tactfully concealed beneath the veneer of glamour, charisma and a bit of material pertaining to religion and as a result Muslims men and women tend to overlook its perils and repeatedly get lured into logging on to it.
In one of Facebook’s Discussion Board there are posts from 17 users out of which 5 (29%) were from Muslims. Based on this finding and transpolating these statistics into the general population, at least 29% of the Facebook users could be assumed to be Muslims.
Even if we do not base our calculation on this result and have it based on world population figures, which indicate that Muslims constitute 20% of the total world population (minimum estimate), then the above statistics could proportionately be translated into the following with regards to Muslim users, both male and female:
 
Ø More than 100 million active Muslim users
Ø 50% of our active Muslim users (50 million) log on to Facebook on any given day
Ø Muslims spend over 140 billion minutes per month on Facebook
Ø There are over 180 million objects that Muslims interact with (pages, groups, events and community pages)
Ø More than 6 billion pieces of content (web links, news stories, blog posts, notes, photo albums, etc.) shared by Muslims each month.
Ø There are more than 40 million active Muslim users currently accessing Facebook through their mobile devices.
From the figures given above one can see how obsessed Muslims have become with Facebook. This obsession has even led some of us to become frenziedly addicted to it. Stealthily it is infiltrating our lifestyles and our lives and there are signs we might eventually get enslaved to it.
Today a Muslimah’s hijab and niqab are being reduced to shreds, thanks to Facebook. Our daughters, sisters, wives and even mothers of some of us have started uninhibitedly interacting and chatting with ghair-mehrams, are freely watching their (ghair-mehrams’) pictures and posting their own so that the ghair-mehrams of the  world can feast on them. To look at a woman with lust constitutes the zinnah of the eyes. What about our young Muslim women who eagerly and candidly post their picture in which they are often portrayed with their heads uncovered, revealing their various hairstyles and at times in very provocative postures? Have the Ummah of the Prophet Muhammad (sallalahu alayhi wasallam), the greatest man that ever lived on this earth, stooped so low as to allow their daughters to behave like the Kuffar women?
“But there are some articles/blogs/links etc that night be beneficial to Muslims,” some of you might argue. Please try to look for the rebuttal in this question: Is it permissible to visit and spend our valuable time in a place where Allah’s commands are explicitly and flagrantly violated just because there are a couple of ayaahs of the Holy Qur’an hanging on the wall? 
This is just the tip of the iceberg. The situation is much more frightening. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg says, “The age of privacy is over.” He told a live audience recently that if he were to create Facebook again today, user information would by default be public, not private as it was for years until the company changed dramatically in December 2009.
He is right. Facebook is now much more unrestricted and open. It has prompted our once modest Muslim girls into becoming very outgoing and bold and ready to ‘expose’ themselves in every way possible. Photographs of single Muslim girls from respectable families are an order of the day in Facebook. These are not ordinary pictures but very intimate ones. In some of these photographs one girl was shown hugging and embracing Kuffar male celebrities. They were definitely not Madam Tussaud’s wax figures but real life human beings.
The question to ask Muslim brothers and sister, if this is the scenario today then what will happen in the next ten years or even five years?
In 2010 Facebook hosted a competition “Everybody Draw Mohammed Day”. There were big protests in the Muslim world against the move and the Islamic Lawyers Forum filed a petition with Pakistan’s Lahore High Court. On May 18, 2010, Justice Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry ordered Pakistan’s Telecommunication Authority to block access to Facebook until May 31. The ban was lifted on May 31 after Facebook reportedly assured the Lahore High Court that it would remedy the issues in dispute. Apparently the page has been pulled from Facebook. However, there is no guarantee Facebook would not involve in another mischief against Islam in future.
Are we all aware what our daughters/sisters/wives are up to? In some cases the answer would be in negative. While in other cases quite a few of our Brothers and Sisters are fully aware the ladies from their household have their pictures and all their personal info in the internet. Some of them actually feel proud and do not miss the opportunity to pass compliments like ‘Wow! You look so sweet in Facebook!’
For those of us who are not aware about the affairs of our next of the kin with regards to Facebook, you can simply type the name of the person to be investigated in a search engine like Google and you will get all the information you need and much more. Chances are, what you see might hit you like a bolt from the blue.
One Mufti sums it up all in his response to a query about a husband allowing his wife to have a Facebook account:
‘For a female to indulge in any activity that promotes her to outsiders is not allowed. This is proven from many Verses of Quran and Ahadeeth of our Rasool (sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
For this reason a woman does not give adhaan, khutba or lectures; she does not lead the salaah. Going onto Facebook entails publicizing oneself and interacting with other people. For a woman to do so, or for the husband to allow his wife to do this, is not permissible in Islam.
Even a man who chats and communicates with females over Facebook is committing a major sin. Posting photographs of oneself on Facebook is also not permissible.
We need to abstain from these indulgences that make our imaan weak.
Please pass this message on to our brothers and sisters and make them aware of the wrong in Facebook and similar programs.’
By this message I want to appeal; to the entire Muslim population of the world, irrespective of their adherences and beliefs, to unite and stop our brothers/sisters/sons/daughters/wives/husbands from falling prey to Shaytan’s nefarious tricks. Also, as Muslims it becomes incumbent upon us  to forward this message to as many Muslim Brothers and Sisters as we can, so that it, inshAllah,  reaches every Muslim on this earth.  Jazakumullahi Khairan.
To get first hand information for this article I had to view some Facebook pages for which I beg Allah’s forgiveness.
And Allah (Subhana Wataala) knows best…

It’s ‘Allahu Akbar’ as Islam spreads across Maasailand

Standard

It’s ‘Allahu Akbar’ as Islam spreads across Maasailand
THE STANDARD
Tuesday, 11th January 2011
By LEONARD KORIR

MASAIMARA, KENYA
When a group of villagers defied the centuries-old Maasai culture and introduced Islam to Transmara District more than two decades ago, elders threatened to curse them.

Friends and relatives shunned individuals who embraced the religion.
Christian leaders launched a silent war with the new faith, which they regarded as alien to the conservative community.

But 20 years later, seeds planted by the few Islamic preachers are fast sprouting as more Maasai’s embrace Islam which fo many years was seen as a reserve for coastal communities.

The religion, which was introduced in the area in 1986 by a local Muslim, Mohammed ole Sekengei has attracted more than 5,000 followers in parts of Transmara in the recent past.

Elders who have converted to Islam stand outside a mosque.[PHOTOS: LEONARD KORIR/STANDARD]

Maasai morans slaughter a goat to mark “Eid Ul Haj” in Trans Mara District recently. [PHOTO: LEONARD KORIR/STANDARD ]

Sekengei who works with the Cultural Council of Iran at the Iranian Embassy in Kenya has also seen the contruction of more than five mosques and madrassa [schools] in the area.

According to one of the oldest converts, Ibrahim ole Parsiria, 82, from Shartuka Mosque, Islam, unlike other religions is more tolerant to the Maasai culture, hence the reason for its fast growth and acceptance in the area.

Ole Parsiria was assimilated in 2008 after accepting the religion and has never looked back.

FACING EAST
He says Islam had similarities with the Maasai culture. “Just like the Muslims pray as they face Mecca (East) and so do the Maasai face that direction,” says ole Parsiria.

“The Maasai always face East whenever they are seeking Enkai’s (God’s) intervention and we found the same is done by Muslims,” says Parsiria.

Other similarities that attracted Maasai people to the Islamic faith are polygamy and the position of women in the society. “Just like the Maasai, Muslim women take a backstage role in any decision-making and participation in prayers,” says Parsiria. [Here is a chance for women to debate this mistaken assertion. Surely in Islam women are complimentary, not subservient. Can we blame this misstatement on Globish written by this journalis[? – JM]

In both parties, women and men always stay apart from each other in public gatherings as a sign of respect.

Another elder, Ali Murtasa ole Nchaiyua who embraced Islamic faith almost ten years ago has influenced all his nine children to follow suit.

He says he finds comfort in the [Muslim] faith unlike other religion and faults claims that it would interfere with the Maasai culture.
Among the converts is the Meguara location chief, Hussein ole Deroni and his family.

Deroni embraced Islam in 1989 and some of his children were born Muslims. Other prominent local people who have joined the faith include former Kisii District Commissioner Abdullahi Leloon.

The year 2000 was a turning point to the then new faith in the area when six elders went on pilgrimage, trekking from Kilgoris to Mombasa.
The walk that lasted for 22 days was aimed at raising funds for the establishment of Shartuka Islamic Centre comprising of a mosque, madrassa, a health centre and a nursery school.

After the walk, Nchayua says they managed to get Sh500,000 from an Imam (teacher) together with several pledges from the Muslim community at the coast. “When we reached the coastal town, we prayed with our brothers and at the end of it they were kind enough and pledged to help,” says Nchayua.

However, the dream of setting up an Islamic Complex Centre in the area became a reality recently when the Muslim faithful from Dubai through the Islamic Bank, which pledged Sh32 million for the project.

THE HOLY BOOK
The Imam of Shartuka Mosque Ramadhan Swaleh says he was impressed with the positive response from local Maasai to Islam. Swaleh already has about 50 children attending the madrassa classes besides teaching grown ups Arabic.

Mastering Arabic, he told The Standard was crucial in studying the Koran. “I was posted here five years ago and I can say that the local people here have received the faith with a lot of zeal,” says Swaleh.
He recalls last year’s Eid Ul Hajj celebrations where more than 30 locals joined the faith. “This was the biggest ever batch of converts to publicly announce their conversion of Islam,” Swaleh says.

However, Swaleh says the drive to convert more locals was facing challenges. The most serious challenge according to Swaleh is the ability among the locals to master the Koran. He says most of the locals were illiterate hence face difficulties in reading and interpreting the holy book.

Kassim ole Nadoo, a youth leader says as local Muslims, they will ensure their rights and problems were well addressed. Nadoo says that some unknown people believed to be against the faith constantly invade the mosques and destroy property as others target land belonging to the Muslims. “With our unity, we are optimistic of endorsing some of us to vie for political office in the area,” says Nadoo.

Truth Found

Standard

It is along story but worth reading!!!
By: S. Ghaffan

I was born of staunch Catholic Christian parents. My father was a preacher who
knew the Bible almost by heart my mother, an orthodox Catholic, would only give
us the morning coffee after her return from Church.
Even from my youngest days, I was made to memorize certain verses from the
Bible.
By the time I had completed the study of all the four Gospels and knew many
important verses, in those four books, by heart.
My father sometimes took me along with him when he went to preach, and from the
special attention he paid to my knowing certain controversial points, and his
teaching me the methods of explaining to the others those intricacies, it was
quite obvious that he wanted me to succeed him in his profession. The strong
desire of the paternal love to make me a priest was implemented by educating me
with a detailed knowledge of the Bible and the science of ministering it to
others. By the time I reached the Form IV in school I could preach the gospels
in my own way, supervised by my father. Many senior missionaries admired my
knowledge of the important doctrines of the faith. I passed the Form VI and
joined College. There I came in contact with several classmates who were
Protestants, and some of whom were well versed in the study of the Protestant
Bible.
I often met my Protestant classmates and discussed matters regarding differences
in our faith and the performance of rituals. There were also some Muslim
students, but I met them only in the play ground as I hated meeting Muslims whom
I took to be dangerous fanatics. By the time I completed the first year in
College, I was sufficiently grounded in the knowledge of the Christian faith as
held by the Catholic Church and had also considerable knowledge of the
Protestant view point. Appreciating this knowledge of the Catholic faith in my
young age I was given a scholarship from the church funds and in return for the
help I received, I was required to receive special coaching in the guidance of
deeper thoughts about certain parts of the Holy Book, under of the Chief Priest
of the Church who loved to teach me very much and was very intimately attached
to me. He used the special devotional methods of worshiping Jesus and his Holy
Mother. Having appeared in the first group for my intermediate course I used to
sit working at his subjects till late at night.
One night when all were asleep and I was absorbed in my studies an idea suddenly
struck my mind to examine the doctrine of the Holy Trinity, the Basic formula of
the Christian faith. The question, how three different things can be one and the
same, arose in my mind i.e. how anything singularly absolute in its unity with
its indivisible oneness, can ever by itself become divided into three separate
beings with three variant native attributes opposed to each other justifying the
distribution into the three different entities.
My failure to reconcile my belief in the Trinity with the reasoning of the
science of logic, created a mental restlessness in me. Days passed on and many a
time I thought of asking my father to help me in solving the problem which was
puzzling my mind. But I knew that my father would never appreciate the least
doubt in the dogmatic belief of the Catholic School and my venture to discuss
anything hated by the Catholic faith, would only create further problems in my
domestic life. However, one day when I found my father in a happy mood, I asked
him as to how he would defend the Christian faith in the Holy Trinity against
the attacks from the members of the other religions of the world. The answer
was:
“In matters of faith one has to stop reasoning. One should belief in the
doctrine only by one’s heart and mind.”
This reply from my father upset me further more and disappointed me to a very
great extent and all my thinking got centered in the question which had become a
definite problem to puzzle my mind further and I wondered saying:
“What! Is this the Foundation upon which is built the huge edifice of the
Christian faith? Is the basis of my own faith only a matter of a blind following
of some dictated belief which can never stand reasoning or the independent
scrutiny by the dispassionate and impartial arguments from the clean
conscience?”
I became much worried and made up my mind to find some arguments to somehow make
my much disturbed mind at least imagine that one could at one and the same time
be three different persons, and the three different persons could at the same
time remain one.
One day our Mathematics Professor was sitting alone in his room and I got in
with his permission and asked him if he would help me to solve something which
to me was an intricate and a perplexing problem. He very kindly asked me what it
was. I told him to explain to me in what sense one and the same person could be
three different beings, and the same three different beings with their
individual differences could at the same time be the indivisible absolute one?
Glorious Quran
Listen to the beautiful recitation of the Glorious Quran [Maryam (Mary)]  The
Professor smiled and said:
“Is it that you do not like my stay in this college?”
I asked him: “Why Sir?”
He said:
“What do you think the college authorities which are staunch Catholics will do
with me, if some one informs them that I discuss in my private room things
opposed to the Catholic or the Christian faith in general? Will they keep me on
the staff of the College any longer? If you want to discuss anything here, you
may do so but mind you, you must confine your discussion to the subject of your
studies in the College, otherwise you will be doing the worst harm to me for I
will be thrown out of my job.”
I felt the truth in his statement and made an appointment with him to see him
the next Sunday at 3.00 pm in his house.
On Sunday when I met the Professor he first asked me as to what made me enquire
into the Doctrine of Trinity. I said that I wanted to know how far the doctrine
stood to reasoning?
The Professor smiled and said, “Why don’t you ask any one of our priests?”
I said “I have asked them but they say it is a matter of belief or faith and it
should not be subjected to any logic or philosophy. This has upset me It his has
raised the question in me, if what I believe in, is unreasonable and illogical,
why should I subject myself to any blind following? Is God so unjust and cruel
to expect man to believe in a doctrine about Himself, which no human brain can
ever reasonably conceive? I request you, Sir; to some how give me some method of
arguing out the possibility of such an existence as the doctrine of Trinity
wants us to believe in!”
The professor smiled and said: “My dear Joseph suppose you want me to prove by
some mathematical formula how water can remain water and at the same time be
fire, or how a stone can be a stone at the same time be water too, how can I do
it? I do not think any sensible man on earth can ever conceive such a
possibility. How the Ever living God who being the Ever living Life itself, can
also at the same time be a mortal i.e. be a man to suffer death at the hands of
the other mortals? And how the same mortal being at the same time could be the
Absolute Immortal God? It is a problem which our priests want us to believe and
we have to merely believe in it and none has any choice of even questioning the
practicability of this inconceivable dogma.”
On hearing the answer I asked him: “Then, what about you, Sir? Don’t you also
believe in it?”
He replied: “It is a matter of my own personal and individual choice and
decision. Even if I or the world, were to believe in such a doctrine the
liability still remains for every believer to answer the question if he or she
can prove the doctrine as a reasonable or practical phenomena.”
He went on saying; “The fact is when God, Whom we believe as One, is Absolutely
One Being in His perfect unity, it means that God is singularly one in natural
essence of His existence, free from any different or variant factors having
anything to do with His pure or Absolute Unity to justify His being The Absolute
One, owing an indivisible existence, by Himself. Division suggests that the one
is not an Absolute One, but a compound of some variants and that which is a
composed being can never be really one in the true meaning of oneness. And
certainly the one dependent in its existence upon its different components can
never be independent in its action, whereas God is the Absolute One,
Independently Omnipotent in His Will and His Action.
“Besides how can any three which are three separate beings, with three
variations justify their being three separate entities, remain there separately
as they are and at the same time by themselves lose their different individual
native properties differentiating them from each other, and become conceivably
the absolute indivisible one, without the least variation in the essential
oneness.
“An Absolute one must be totally independent in its existence, Mr. Joseph, as it
impossible to reason out the doctrine of the Holy Trinity. The science of
Mathematics or any other science which any human genius can ever conceive, until
the end of time, can never solve this inconceivable riddle.”
He continued:
“The only thing is that we, Christians, are shut out of the vast sources of
knowledge about the truth and of the higher factors in matters of religion which
are available outside our own fold, by damning every non-Christian as the
devil’s work. We Christians, Mr. Joseph, in our madness to swell up our ranks
have played such a disgraceful role that a great head like Sir Dennison Ross had
to helplessly disclose the truth about this in his foreword to the translation
of the Quran by George Sale.”
I was amazed to hear the arguments of the Professor who was himself known as a
Catholic, and at the same time I was very much encouraged to know that my doubt
about the unreasonability of the doctrine of Trinity was something which had
made a highly educated and enlightened mind like the Professor of Mathematics
also to enquire into it. I was much benefited by the discussion with the
Professor as I came to know arguments justifying the doubt created in my mind.
My study of the matter in the Islamic Literature, and the translation of the
Quran opened my eyes to many great and very important factors that effect human
life on earth. Once I visited the Professor in his house and to my further
amazement I found him possessing a great amount of literature on Islam.
I asked him:
“May I know, Sir, if you have embraced the faith of the Muslims?”
He replied:
“It is a question yet to be decided. You do not worry yourself about my personal
choice. I, for the time being, want to be known as no other than a Catholic
Christian. I will tell you later.”
I took the copy of the translation of the Quran by George Sale and read the
introduction by Sir E. Dennison Ross. The introduction needs to be read with
special attention. Sir Ross says:
“For many centuries the acquaintance which the majority of Europeans possessed
of Muhammadanism was based almost entirely on distorted reports of fanatical
Christians which led to the discrimination of a multitude of gross calumnies.
What was good in Muhammadanism was entirely ignored and what was not good in the
eyes of Europe was exaggerated or misinterpreted.
“The unity of God and that the simplicity of his creed was probably a more
potent factor in the spread of Islam than the sword of the Ghaziz.” (G. Sale’s
translation of the Koran – Introduction).
This statement of the great Christian scholar of international repute, created
in me the thirst to know the original teachings of Islam, especially about the
Islamic conception of God.
About four years passed away, and by this time I knew the contents of the Quran.
Many things had arrested my special attention. I had discussed many doubtful
points with the Professor whom I found to have read the Quran several times with
a better and more critical view. I was now longing to meet some Muslim scholar
to cross-examine him about certain doubts about the Islamic faith.
Once I thought of Hinduism but what I saw daily with my own eyes, curses of
untouchability and the reservations of the caste system prevalent before us, and
besides everything else, the idol worship and the observance of innumerable
rituals did not prompt me to take up any enquiry into the tenets, the practice
of which manifested in the daily life of the millions of Hindus living with us.
I could never understand the superiority exclusively and arbitrarily claimed for
the members of certain castes, simply because they had accidentally been born in
those folds. I had seen with my own eyes how the people belonging to certain
castes are imagined as lower in the society and are treated as the untouchables,
not allowed even to enter into the Hindu temples. I had seen these poor souls
being prohibited even to take drinking water from the wells reserved for the
superior classes.
I met several Brahmin Pandits but none of them could answer any one of my
objections against the several Hindu theories regarding the authorities of the
hundreds of gods and goddesses and the observance of the rituals which did not
appeal to me in the least.
The havoc in the social life played by Hinduism dividing humanity into castes
and sub-castes and the unreasonable superiority of one caste over the other, is
itself so much repulsive that none would like to take any trouble of executing
any studies about the doctrines of the faith.
While resenting the caste system and the sectarian segregation in the Hindu
folds, I was automatically reminded of the similar restrictions amongst
Christians. Caste hatred has been sunk so deep in the minds of the Hindus that
even after entering Christianity they are unable to overcome the complex.
I asked myself:
“Why criticize other people and their belief when the religion which I myself
belong to, has in it the sectarian segregation of the Brahmin Christian, the
Naidu Christian, the Chuckli Christian and similar sectarian differences, having
full sway over the social order? Are not churches in Christendom owned
exclusively for the members of particular sects? Are there not churches
belonging to a particular sect which cannot be used by the people of the other
sect? Has not Christianity failed to unite mankind into one human society? Did
Jesus preach all these differences and dissensions which we the Christians have
innovated? Is it not then that we are far away from the original objects of the
Mission of Jesus Christ?”
Against the irreconcilable differences and the innumerable dissensions of the
social order in the folds of Hinduism and Christianity, I was very much
impressed by the genuine and the real brotherhood practiced day and night among
the Muslims. I found that a Muslim mosque is a mosque belonging to every one who
calls himself a Muslim and that there is no reservation of seats in the mosque
or any sectarian segregation in any of the Muslim places of worship. I saw with
my own eyes, Muslims of all ranks, all social and economic status, of different
complexions, of various nationalities, all standing in one row, turning towards
one direction, praying to one God, in one language, and immediately after the
prayer, shaking hands with each other. Brotherhood or social equality claimed
more in theory by the other schools of thought in the world, I found it to be an
ever experienced, and a living reality in the daily life of the Islamic folds.
One day I was informed by the Professor who by this time had become an intimate
friend of mine that a Muslim scholar was to deliver some talks in English on the
life of the Prophet of Islam in a Hall near the Big Juma Mosque, under the
auspices of the Muslim Youth Association of Trichinopoly Town. My Professor and
I, both attended the three talks and met the Lecturer who was an old friend of
the Professor. We had a heart to heart talk with the Lecturer about several
important topics. The Lecturer presented to me a few more back numbers of the
magazine ‘The Peace Maker.’

And as for Ishmael I have heard thee, Behold, I have blessed him and will make
him fruitful, and I will multiply him exceedingly, Twelve Princes shall he beget
and I will make him a great nation. Gen. 17:20  During my meeting with the
Muslim Lecturer I asked him if he would kindly answer some questions for my own
information. He said:
“I will most willingly do it.”
I put the following questions which he very cheerfully answered:
“What proofs have you besides the Quran to establish that Muhammad was truly a
Prophet of God?”
He answered: “Have your own Bible with you, I said, “Yes.”
He took the following verses and read them to me one after another:
The Acts. 3
Verses: 22 “For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your
God raise unto you of your brethern, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all
things whatsoever he shall say unto you.”
Verses: 23 “And it shall come to pass, that every soul, which will not hear that
Prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people.”
Verses: 24 “Yea! And all the prophets from Samuel and those that follow after,
as many as have spoken, have likewise foretold of these days.”
The Acts. 7
Verses: 37 “This is that Moses, which said unto the children of Israel, A
Prophet shall the Lord raise up unto you of your brethern, like unto me; him
shall ye hear.”
John 14 Jesus says:
Verses: 16 “I will pray the Father, and he shall give another comforter – that
he may abide with you forever.”
16:12 “I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye can not bear them now.”
16:13 “Howbeit, when he the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you unto all
truth for he shall not speak of himself, but whatsoever he shall hear, that
shall he speak; he will show you things to come.”
I read the passages which I had already gone through several times before, but
this time the perfect confidence with which the Lecturer asked me to read the
verses from my own sacred scriptures in support of his claim, threw a new light
upon them for me to understand the matter dispassionately. Yet I replied:
“But the prophecy is about the advent of Jesus?”
He smiled and said:
“You read the verse again! Does not the verse say that God will raise a Prophet
like unto Moses” i.e. He will be a man born of a father and a mother as was born
Moses; whereas Jesus was born only of a mother. Besides, the Prophet promised by
God must be a man like Moses but you yourself call Jesus as the son of God.
Moses was a law giving Prophet and the one like him must also be a law-giver,
whereas Jesus was only a law-abider, following the law or the Ten Commandments
already introduced through Moses. Besides, one must betray his common sense as
well as his learning to say that, I and He, the two different person i.e. The
First and the Third person mean the same, or the one who departs prophesying
about the advent of some one else, to be one and the same.”
The argument was quite reasonable and unbreakable.
Then I asked the Lecturer:
“Do you not believe in Jesus as the son of God? Cannot Jesus be God himself in
the form of a man?”
The Lecturer smiled and very cheerfully replied.
“Can there be a son to any one without a wife, my friend? Can anyone, or you
yourself, who believes in the sonship of Jesus, at any time sensibly imagine
Virgin Marry to have been used by God as a wife was done to conceive an issue?
Let us seek protection of God against any such devilish straying of our minds.
Sonship, if used in the Bible, can be used only to mean a creature or the one
who has received life from God. Otherwise what do you say about Jesus addressing
himself as a son of man.
Luke 7:34 “The son of man is come eating and drinking and ye say, behold a
gluttenous man, and a wine biber, a friend of publicans and sinners.”
Luke 9:26 “The son of man be ashamed.”
“Jesus addressed God as his father and also as our father which means that God
is taken as the father of Jesus as much as He is the father (or the Creator) of
any one of us, and hence Jesus’ sonship can mean in the sense of a creature of
God, the term son of God used by Jesus can be used only in sense of a servant of
God – as Jesus himself refers to himself as God’s servant. This fact is
testified by the Verses by which every prophet of God until Adam has been termed
as the son of God in Luke 3rd Chapter in verses from to 30 Jesus is called as
the son of Joseph and the genealogy of Joseph is traced to Adam and Adam is
called the son of God. Read the 30th verse of the same chapter.”
Luke 3:37 “Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the
son of Adam, which was the son of God.”
(These ready answers from the Bible created a very deep impression upon my mind
about the mount of comparative study the Muslims do and how strong and
reasonable they are in their faith about Unity of God. One can say that the
faith of the Muslims is not a matter of mere blind following of any prescribed
belief in unreasonable dogmas but it is the result of a sincere comparative
study of the various schools of though.)
I asked the Lecturer:
“Do you Muslims study every other religion before you embrace Islam?”
The lecturer replied:
“No. Even as we remain Muslim, born of Muslim parents, we have been commanded by
God to compare and contrast the truth, i.e. Islam, with every other faith and
then own for ourselves a belief or conviction of our own which alone shall be
acceptable to God as mere blind following of any particular doctrine, be that
from our own parents, will not be of any credit to such a believer. Read what
the Holy Quran enjoins upon those who have already professed Islam as their
faith merely by heredity.
I asked:
“Do you believe in the Holy Bible as a Heavenly Book or not?”
In reply to my question the Lecturer requested me to answer the following
questions:
1). “Is the Bible, which is in your hands, the book which Jesus wrote as a
scripture revealed by God or to be called the book of his own?”
I had to say, “No.”
2). “Did Jesus order or desire at any time in his life to write anything on his
behalf?”
“No.”
3). “Was this Bible which is in your hands written during the time of Jesus?”
“No.”
4). “Was this Bible which is in your hands today written immediately after the
departure of Jesus?”
“No.”
“Then” he said, “Please read page 17 in ‘The Founder of Christianity and His
Religion’ published by the Christian Literature Society, Madras. It is said in
the Book:
The whole Bible contains sixty six books written by forty different authors over
a space of about fifteen centuries.
It is clearly said in the book that:
‘Jesus Christ himself wrote nothing.’
Oral teaching was for several years – the only means employed in the spread of
Christianity. It was for the guidance of those young converts, that the earliest
writings of the New Testament were composed.”
The same book further discloses that:
“They were probably written about twenty years after the death of Christ.”
On page 18 it is stated:
“The Gospels do not give a complete history of the Life of Christ, they are
rather memoirs.”
I said:
‘But the Bible is the word of God inspired and written by the disciples of
Jesus’
He again smiled and said:
Mr. Joseph, if the Bible is the Book of the disciples and of Jesus, how would
you account for the differences in the Book, if it is an inspired word of God.
Does not the Catholic Bible Duay contain some books which the Protestant version
does not own?
Have you read what Mr. Wilson says about the Bible, in his introduction to the
‘Diaglot’ published by the Watch Tower Society?
“If it had not been published by kingly authority it would not now be venerated
by English and American Protestants, as thought it had come direct from Cod. It
has been convicted of containing over 20,000 errors. Nearly 700 Creeks MSS. are
how known and some of them very ancient whereas the translator of the common
version had only the advantage of some 8 MSS none of which was earlier then the
tenth century.
“Is not the Bible based upon only 8 manuscripts whereas there are 700
manuscripts now available? If what is contained in all such manuscripts is also
the inspired word of (God, why were these manuscripts left away? In view of all
these facts brought to your light, if you still believe in the Bible as the
inspired word of God, you may do so but you can’t expect the whole world to do
it. If you make a serious and an impartial study of the Old and the New
Testaments, you will find in them the amount of blasphemies which the Jewish
mind has fabricated against Lot, David, Noah and Abraham who were the Holy
Apostles of God viz:
Gen. 9:20 “And Noah began to be a husbandman, and he planted a vineyard.”
And he drank of the vine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent.
And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two
breathren without.
“And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon their father; and their
faces were backward, and they saw not their father’s nakedness.”
Gen. 19:36 “Lot committing adultery with his own daughters”
II. Sam, 11:4 David taking possession of his neighbor’s wife.
I asked, “What? Do you Muslims believe in the prophets of God other than
Muhammad to be totally sinless and holy?”
He answered me by reciting to me the following verses of the Holy Quran.
2:136 “Say (O Muslims): We believe in Allah and that which is revealed unto us
and that which was revealed unto Abraham, and Ishmael, and Isaac, and Jacob, and
the tribes, and that which Moses and Jesus received, and that which the prophets
received from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and unto
Him we have surrendered.”
“The Apostle (Muhammad) believes in what has been revealed to him from his Lord,
and so do the believers, (i.e. Muslims) they all believe in Allah (God) and his
angels, His book (the different holy scriptures) and His Apostles; we make no
difference between any of His apostles.”
The following verse of the Holy Quran informs us of the fact that Prophets were
raised by God, among all nations in all parts of the earth.
35:24 “There is not a nation but a Warner has gone among them.”
It convinced me that Islam alone, is an all comprehensive faith which recognizes
all other religions and which contains in it a perfectly harmonious integration
of all the good, found partly in the other religious orders of the world. The
sacred book of Islam i.e. the Holy Quran, is the final exposition of the Divine
Truth in its Perfection which was revealed at different times, through the other
heavenly scriptures, in parts suiting the various evolutionary levels.
The above verses of the Holy Quran bear clear of conception by the human minds.
The limitation testimony to the, fact that, as one of the fundamentals of the
human mind of the different ages, did not of his Faith, every Muslim has to
believe not only allow even prophets like Jesus to speak out the whole in the
Holy Prophet Muhammad but in all the other of the truth. Jesus had to depart
with many things prophets as truthful and holy and should not make yet to be
told to his people. (John. 16:14). Jesus had to tell his people to wait until
the advent of the Spirit of Truth to disclose the whole of the Truth. (John
16:13)
I was further impressed by the Universal aspect of the religion Islam.
Every answer from the Lecturer was with an unchallengeable authority and with an
unbreakable argument. I was awakened to differentiate between genuine truth and
the fabrications of falsehood and to know many new factors to which I was blind
all these years. But I did not know how to reconcile the dawn of true knowledge
of truth with my original blind dogmatic belief and my belonging to the
Christian faith any longer. I wanted to find out some failure on the part of the
Lecturer to answer satisfactorily some questions or the other, so that I may
have some excuse, be that even a false one, to maintain my position in the
Christian faith.
The Lecturer continued after some time with the question:
“Shall I ask you something if you do not mind answering it for my information?”
I said: ‘Yes’.
He asked: “Do you think Jesus to be a son of God or God himself?”
I said: ‘Jesus, according to the Christian belief is God Himself in the form of
His Son.’
He asked: Can you ever conceive anyone to be the immortal God and at the same
time be a mortal (Man) to be caught in the hands of other mortals to suffer
death?
“Can anything be high and at the same time low, black and at the same time be
white? Can there be darkness and the same time light? What philosophy is this?”
The Lecturer continued saying:
“Do you ever consider that there is one other question confronting the doctrine
of the Trinity which needs to be answered by every Trinitarian that if any three
different beings which are three different entities, are also at the same time
One, with absolute unity in all the perfect sense or meaning of Oneness, what is
the common control which makes them remain three and also be one at one and the
same time? If there be any factor of such a wonderful and inconceivable
phenomena causing this amazing effect, then that supreme causative power, which
controls the number and the unity, will alone be the Omnipotent God and not any
one of the three which are only the controlled components.
“Besides, there arises another problematic question which a believer in the
Trinity will have to answer i.e. as to whom is that controls or determines the
splitting of one into only three different others, to be neither more nor less
in number? There must be some cause for this controlled effect and that the
causative factor acting supreme over three will be the Omnipotent God and not
any one of the three which will only be the effect of the supreme controlling
cause.
“Similarly, will arise the question, what is the causative power which affects
the three to be only one when joining together and not divided into many groups
of beings and if there be any such cause, that supreme controlling cause will be
the Omnipotent God and not anyone of the three which will only be the
subservient one.
Under any circumstances no sensible man can ever reasonably believe in any
effect whatsoever without some causative factor effecting it.
“However the Holy Trinity is only a problematic doctrine created by the
Christian Church which no logical reasoning can ever prove true.”
I had to helplessly agree to the views of the Lecturer for I could not now
reasonably believe in the existence of anything being itself and at the same
time being its own opposite.
“I would like you, Mr. Joseph” said the Lecturer, “to ponder a little over the
belief that Jesus being God Himself or the son of God, was so terrified at the
impending crucification that he shouted:
Matthew 27:46 “Eli, Eli, Lama Sabachthani” (My God, My God, hast thou forsaken
me?)
“What philosophy is that? If Jesus was God Himself, does it mean that God was
forsaken by God Himself and can that be God who felt hopeless and shouted to be
rescued?
“Your Bible itself, Mr. Joseph, reports that the son of God was forsaken by his
father (God) in which case the forsaken son automatically and quite naturally
forfeits his personal merits as a son and his relationship of being a son to his
father. What do you say? Of what profitable use can the attachment to a forsaken
son be? Mr. Joseph, please tell me.”
I was struck dumb – I did not know what to say and what to do with the faith I
already possessed as a staunch Christian.
“Besides,” the Lecturer continued: “Do you think Jesus to be God Himself when he
falls down crying, praying to someone else to remove the cup of death by
crucification?”
I asked:
“Alright Sir, how do you reconcile the violence used by the Prophet of Islam to
his being an Apostle of God?”
Immediately came the reply from the Lecturer.
“Please, Mr. Joseph, quote a single instance from the whole life history of the
Holy Prophet Muhammad to show that he has ever committed any unprovoked
aggression or any single instance of his taking the least initiative in
attacking any single soul. Each expedition of a battle he led or he allowed was
only in self-defense. Had he not defended as he did, today his advent in this
world and his teachings about the truth about God which the world has learnt
only through his holy mission, would have become legends of ancient times full
of blasphemies for you and for me, only to be read in story books and thus be
deluded by falsehood for all times. The Bible does not preach self-defense. The
Bible only preaches self-surrender to the extent of handing over everything of
one’s possession when anything which was in one’s hand has been taken away by
any aggressor. Does any Christian power follow this?
“Apart from the political history of the Christian nations of Europe do you not
remember the inhuman methods employed by Christendom to spread its faith?”
I was ashamed to hear what has been reported and I had to listen quietly to the
records of the disgraceful conduct of the Christians. I, at last, ventured to
ask one more question. ‘There is the doctrine of atonement or expiation of sins
of men through the blood of Jesus. Jesus having paid the price of the sins of
man i.e. he who believes in Jesus is cleansed and saved. Have you any such
accommodation in Islam?’
The Lecturer smiled and replied:
“My friend, the greatest of God’s gifts to man is common sense. If man forfeits
it of his own accord, then none can help him.
“First let me know if this doctrine appeals to reason and common sense. A, for
example, a Christian by faith i.e. a believer in Jesus Christ as his Savior,
plunders the house of B and the members of B’s family. Does sense or logic agree
to A being let off unpunished by any law, particularly the Law of the All Just
Lord of the Universe, simply because A accepts Jesus as his Savior?”
I had to say, ‘No’. Because, to say otherwise would mean I forfeit my common
sense and go against reasoning.
He continued:
“There is one very grave aspect of the doctrine of atonement through the blood
of Jesus i.e. when we pay for a thing, the thing becomes our own and the
previous owner of the thing forfeits all his claim over it for the price he has
already received. Is it not?”
I said, ‘Yes’.
Then he said “If the sins of man have been paid for, God has no right to punish
any sinner every sinner who merely believes in Jesus would be free to do
anything in the world which his brutal passion dictates him to do, for God his
Lord has no right whatsoever even to question any sinner, for Jesus has met the
cost of all his sins. Can this ever be sensible logic or common sense? Can this
doctrine help life on earth to continue for one moment in peace and security?”
He continued: “Please remember, Islam wants every individual to be kept bound by
his being answerable with his individual responsibility to virtue against vice,
in the interest of his own individual life as well as the interest of the
collective life in this world, himself as a member of not only the human race
but also of the creation of the Lord as a whole. Islam continuously invites and
encourages man towards righteousness with the promise of the blissful life in
the hereafter and repeatedly warns him against vice and the consequent
chastisement from the All-just Lord.
The Holy Quran repeatedly warns saying:
2:28 “And be on your guard against a day when one soul shall not avail another
in the least, neither shall intercession on its behalf be accepted nor shall
they be helped.”
17:15 “Whoever goes aright, for his own soul does he go aright; and whoever goes
astray, to its detriment only does he goes astray; nor can the bearer of a
burden bear the burden of another, nor do we chastise until we raise an
apostle.”
49:13 “O ye men! Surely we have created you of a male and female, and made you
tribes and families that you may know each other; surely the most honorable of
you with Allah is the one among you most careful (of his duty) surely Allah is
knowing, Aware.”
“While threatening man with grievous punishment in recompense for his evils, the
Holy Quran discloses also the infinite mercy of the All-Merciful Lord who does
not want man, however, much a sinner the individual be, to be totally dejected
or hopeless of the merciful pardon from Him. The only condition for the pardon
he needs, being the sinner’s repentance against his vices, with his intention of
amending his conduct in the future, and turning whole heartedly to obedience and
gratitude to the All-Merciful Lord for His Infinite Grace.
“For goodness sake, tell me, Mr. Joseph, which do you think is reasonable and
sensible, either making man intoxicated and careless against sinning, i.e.
making him unreasonably confident of the price of his sins as having already
been paid by someone or alerting with his commitment to virtue against vice,
i.e. keeping him warned of the natural consequence of getting punishment by the
All-Just Lord, against any misconduct or disobedience?”
I felt that I had that day understood the hollowness of the doctrine of
atonement upon which is built the whole edifice of the Christian faith. The
divine mercy of the Lord dawned upon my heart, a new light of the divine
guidance. I thanked God for liberating me from the clutches of the grossly
misleading dogmatic doctrine and leading me to Islam which I have myself found
through an impartial enquiry that it is the Right and the Straight Royal Road to
Salvation which the All-Merciful Lord Himself has shown man through this Last
Apostle Muhammad, may peace be on Him and his divinely chosen descendants.
When I disclosed my acceptance of the true arguments advanced by the Lecturer
and thanked him, he told me:
“Mr. Joseph! You must thank God for blessing you with the fulfillment of His
merciful promise to every sincere seeker of truth!”
The All-Merciful Lord by His infinite mercy has fulfilled His merciful promise
to give mankind the everlasting guidance through the Holy Prophet Muhammad who
would abide in his guidance for all times. (John, 16:14)
In Muhammad was fulfilled the divine promise for the Prophet, and the promise of
the Lord to raise Twelve Princes in the seed of Ishmael was fulfilled in God’s
raising the Twelve Holy Imams in the family of the Holy Prophet Muhammad who is
the divinely chosen issue of Ishmael.
Gen. 17:20 “And as for Ishmael I have heard thee, Behold, I have blessed him and
will make him fruitful, and I will multiply him exceedingly, Twelve Princes
shall he beget and I will make him a great nation.”
All these Holy Imams were of the purest character and of an undoubtedly godly
conduct and though they never received any education from any other mortal in
this world, all of them, like the Holy Prophet Muhammad, were the wonderful
stores and the Divinely caused fountainheads of knowledge to enlighten the world
with the true knowledge about the Lord of the Universe.
Eleven of these Twelve divinely commissioned Imams or Guides lived as the
perfect models of pure humanity in complete resignation to the Divine Will and
all of them were martyred. If any one wants to see a perfect model of a man
surrendering his all, most willingly suffering the worst and the most painful
affections in the way of the Lord severed, one must see the Holy Imam Hussain at
Karbala.
The world will find Hussain not shouting, “Eli, Eli, Lama Sabachthani”
Or desiring in the least the removal of the cup of death, but drinking it
cheerfully, glorifying the Lord in his last thanks-giving prayers while he was
being butchered in the most heartless way.
As the promise of God to give mankind a Prophet to abide for ever has been
recorded in the Old Testament this Great Sacrifice has also been prophesied in,
Jeremiah 46:10 “For this is the day of the Lord God of hosts a day of vengeance,
that he may avenge him of his adversaries; and the sword shall devour, and it
shall be satiated and made drunk with their blood; for Lord God of Hosts hath a
sacrifice in the north country by the river Euphrates.”
After coming across so many sane and unbreakable arguments against the doctrine
of the Holy Trinity and also about many other fundamentals of Christian belief,
I only wondered how such an unreasonable faith could attract such a huge number
of people in the world. Once I found my father returning home very happy and
immediately as he arrived he called me and said:
‘You will be glad to know my dear son that, today I got 109 souls into our fold.
At the baptism of such a big number in one day the Rev. Father, the Chief of Our
Mission praised my services very much and has increased my salary as well my
traveling allowance and has awarded me with a token reward of Rs. 109
corresponding to the number baptized through my efforts.’
I asked: “Who are they, father, who were baptized today?”
The reply was: “They are from five surrounding villages. There are men, women,
and children, 109 souls together.”
I asked: “Are they all educated?”
The reply was: “No. They are the poor people of the cherries (slums). They are
only laborers in the paddy fields of their villages.”
I asked if they had understood fully their undertaking as converts to the
Christian faith. Would every one of them stand any cross examination against
their decision to leave the folds they were in, and their joining the Christian
belief?
The reply was: “What do you mean? I told you they are all uneducated poor
illiterates; laborers from the slums. The group consists of men, women, and
children. Now, I will have to go there every day and coach them up in the
doctrine of our faith.”
On hearing this I smiled, and seeing me smiling my father asked: “Why do you
smile, Joseph? What is the matter?” I said: “Nothing father! I do not see in
this mass conversion, any matter of pride or pleasure which any true religion or
any genuine or reasonable faith can claim for itself, for it is nothing but
exploiting the illiteracy and ignorance of the poor laborers. It is leading the
mentally blind ones into something which they neither know nor recognize. Do you
think father that any sensible man can reasonably be proud over his getting some
illiterate men, women and children to accept his own ideals and justifiably
claim the least merit or value to his thoughts?”
“While the entry into a faith like Islam is effected only after a detailed study
and enquiry by the learned ones with perfect conviction, we Christians pride
over our success in swelling up our ranks by mass conversions of illiterate
laborers, who, by circumstances, are forced to accept the Christian doctrines
without knowing what they do is right or wrong? An ignorant mind is like a blank
sheet, one can draw upon it whatever one’s fancy chooses and once the
inscription is made to be settled upon such raw material, any artist can pride
over the plate having any particular design of his own. If today to win the
sympathy of the ignorant masses, we boast before our illiterate converts of our
humanity and self sacrifices in the cause of the spread of our faith, will the
outer world also forget the Edict of Milan, father, and will all the records of
the history of the brutal outrages that Christendom committed against the poor
helpless Jews, in its own passionate eagerness and anxiety to swell its ranks,
all together totally vanish?”
I continued: “If you kindly permit me father, I would like to know from you if
this Bible in your hands is to be merely read memorized and preached to the
others or is it to be acted upon in our daily life? If it is to be acted upon
will you kindly show me father, if the Christian world could ever practice the
principle of turning the other cheek also if one is already smitten? Could any
sincere Christian till now, give away his shirt when his coat was taken away?
Will you, father, surrender our whole house if any body invades our residence
and takes possession of any of the rooms in these premises? If the Christian
powers of the world really believe in this doctrine of self surrender, why do
they maintain their military and the police forces? Kindly tell me, father, if
there is any earthly use of merely believing in any golden ideals which can only
adorn the pages of some books and which can only be preached but never
practiced. Why should we not reasonably accept the doctrine of self-defense
taught by Islam and the principle of pardoning our offenders if they are
repentant?
For goodness sake let me know, father, how can three different ones at the same
time be an absolute one, both numerically and also in the essential nature of
perfect unity?
On what reasonable grounds can the one who is forsaken by God, be God Himself
and if Jesus is to be believed as the son of God what claim to the relationship
with his father can a forsaken son have?
“What right has Christendom to claim any truth in it when its spread was caused
by the inhuman atrocities committed by the Christian forces against the poor
helpless Jews? The conduct of the brutal outrages committed in the holy name of
Christ, has been fully reported even by the Christian authorities on Edict of
Milan and by the world renowned Christian Scholar Gibbon in his famous work,
‘The Decline and the Fall of the Roman Empire.”
The Doctrine of Atonement through the blood of Christ, will naturally attract
those sinner who have sinned and who do not want to give up sinning under the
protection of the doctrine that the price of their sins has already been paid
away and however much worst sinners they themselves choose to be, they will not
in the least be chastised for their heinous crimes, for, after Jesus having paid
away for the sins of man, God must have forfeited His claim to punish the
sinners thereafter.
There are many such things father which need a dispassionate study and an
impartial judgment.
“I tell you father, that whatever be the consequences and whatever misfortune
may afflict me, I as one, have decided not to sell away or forfeit my conscience
and common sense to the belief in such unreasonable dogmatic doctrines. I have
embraced Islam, and if you do not get angry with me and kindly allow me to
explain to you the details of my enquiries, I will do it whenever I am wanted to
do so I do not like any thought or belief of mine to be swallowed by anyone by
force, for the religion Islam, which I now openly declare to have embraced,
enjoins that there shall not be any compulsion in the matter of faith as the
truth has been revealed against falsehood.”
To my utter surprise I found my father fully attentive to my exposing my
personal views and convictions and at the end he said:
“Son! Do not think that your father is a fool I have been occasionally
confronted with such ideas during my life whenever I had the occasion of
discussing religion with my Muslim friends. But today the sincerity and the
boldness with which you expose your own convictions make me bold to decide about
the matter. I shall tell you later but, for God’s sake keep this matter strictly
confined to you. Otherwise be sure we will be thrown out into the street as
destitute.”
A few days later my father had a long talk and he decided to declare himself a
Muslim. The details of our sufferings and the social persecution we had to pass
through is a history by itself.
I, now, for the information and guidance of every seeker after Truth, openly
declare the actual findings of my sincere enquiry that Islam is not only the
last of the mighty religions which had revolutionized the world and changed the
destinies of nations, but it is also the perfect and all inclusive faith which
contains in itself all the good, found partly in all other religions which had
preceded it. One of the most distinguishing and striking characteristics of
Islam is that it requires of its followers to believe that all the religions of
the world that preceded it were revealed by God for the respective people of
those ages.
It is one of the fundamentals of this faith that its followers must believe in
all the Prophets who were sent into the world before the Holy Prophet ‘MUHAMMAD’
as truthful and sinless.
Muhammad is the name of the Holy Prophet through whom all this comprehensive
Faith was revealed in its complete or perfect form and meaning, for humanity as
a whole for all times. It is the West that named this Faith as Mohammadanism on
the fashion of Christianity, Buddhism, Confucianism, Zoroastrianism and
Hinduism. Otherwise the name of this religious order is already given in its
book the Holy Quran as ISLAM as quite opposed to the method of naming the order
after its founder, the founder of Islam himself is called a MUSLIM as any other
believer. As the various prophets preached this same Truth among different
nations at different times in different languages, every Apostle of God is
spoken of in the Holy Quran as a Muslim.
Thus I have found, beyond all doubts that Islam is the religion which humanity
needs for its progress in all spheres or aspects of its material as well as
Spiritual life, to earn Salvation in the end.
A Muslim has to believe in all the prophets as truthful and sinless and their
holy books as the true word of God, revealed for the people and for the age, and
also believes in Muhammad as the last of the apostles of God and his book i.e.
the holy Quran as the last of the revealed Word of God to abide forever.
In short, a Muslim embraces, through the holy Quran. Every beauty in every
religion, and turns his face from that which has been added to the religion of
God by man, and that is Islam.
With the truth sufficiently explained, will not every one of us love it? Or will
not every one of us embrace it?
This solemn declaration I make just to be helpful to those who sincerely desire
to know the Truth which they need for themselves to live the life in this world
to reach the blissful destination which is called salvation.
None can ever deny that there can never be any other way to please God than
completely surrendering ourselves to His will, an act which is called ISLAM.
Thus the promise of the Lord to Abraham’s seed was fulfilled in the Advent and
success of the Holy Prophet in establishing the Truth for all times:
New Testament Acts: 3: 22-25
“For Moses truly said unto the fathers, a Prophet shall the Lord your God raise
up unto you of your breathren, like unto me, him shall ye hearken-in all things
whatsoever he shall stay unto you.”
“And it shall come to pass, that every soul which will not near that Prophet
shall be destroyed from among the people.”
“Yea, and all the prophets from Samuel and those that follow after, as many as
have spoken, have likewise foretold of these days.”
“Ye are the children of the Prophets, and of the Covenant which God made with
our fathers saying unto Abraham. And in thy seed shall all the kindred of the
earth be blessed.”
I once again make it openly known that this true and sincere declaration of some
facts is meant for not anyone who does not like to know anything against his
fixed belief, but for those free thinkers who are seriously busy in search of
the Truth and are ready to acknowledge it irrespective of the quarter or the
agency through which it manifests.
Let me conclude with my sincerest thanks and gratitude to the merciful Lord for
I have realized the fulfillment of His merciful promise to guide aright those
who sincerely seek the truth. 
 
 

Ahmed Wetaka
P.O BOX 2488
Mbale- Uganda
Mobile +256 772 609736